Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  528-529 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 528-529 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

THE SPEAKING BODY

Xth Congress of the WAP,

Rio de Janeiro 2016

529

528

Bassols, Miquel.

Language as a Disorder of the Real

. Trans.: V.

Woollard [HB 10, 2013]

“Joyce’s experience of writing showed Lacan precisely that there are no language

disorders properly speaking, but that language itself is the disorder, a disorder

that in the best of cases can be turned into a

sinthome

, a singular way of enjoying

for the subject.”

p. 105

Carbonell, Neus.

Failed Encounters with Real

[LCE 2(13), 2014]

“An analysis begins, then, with a desire for truth, but in Lacan’s late teaching it

has to move towards the impossibility of truth and the insistence of jousissance.

The real of jouissance will not be completely taken by meaning. That is the real

in psychoanalytical experience. A real that, Lacan seems to suggest, has as an

outcome the satisfaction of the

sinthome

.”

p. 6

Guéguen, Pierre-Gilles.

New York, New York, Galaxy of the Ones All

Alone

[2011]. Trans.: N. Wülfing [PN 24, 2012]

“Steve McQueen throws a lucid gaze on the universe of ‘success’ that New

York symbolises. He shows that the identification with the mode of enjoyment

does not hold water when certain contingencies present themselves. He lets

us understand that to go without the father is not easy and that therefore only

the discourse of psychoanalysis permits one to make use of him in order to do

without him. This means finding through the identification with the sinthome

a less venturing tightening of the registers of the imaginary, real and symbolic.”

p. 113

Guéguen, Pierre-Gilles.

Who Is Mad and Who Is Not? On Differential

Diagnosis in Psychoanalysis

, [C/C 1, 2013]

“The Lacanian concept of sinthome refers to a mixture of imaginary and

symbolic that is the closest a subject can get to the ‘pieces of real’ to which he or

she is attached.”

p. 73–74

“It is also what is expected with neurotics: what can be called the satisfaction of

the end of analysis when the subject can finally accept the impossible and be at

peace with the final ‘This is what I am!’ When this is obtained, the sinthome, or

the ‘symptomatic remainder’ as Freud called it, will be the name of the part of

jouissance that the Name-of-the-Father had not been able to appease.”

p. 83

Guégu

e

n, Pierre-Gilles.

Note on the Treatment of the Symptom by the

Analytic Act

. Trans.: J.W. Stone [LI 43/44, 2014]

“Thus, the psychoanalyst is no longer the dupe either of truth or knowledge, but

he is not a

non-dupe

like the behavioral therapist. He is not a non-dupe because

he continues to bet on the resonances of speech. But they are no longer in the

service of deciphering and decrypting, but of the reduction of the symptom to

sinthome, of the direct incidence of the signifier on the body, which is also at

work in the conditioning, except that the analyst does not identify the body

with the patient’s being. The big difference is that the analyst does not believe

himself the master of knowledge, a belief that only ends with the subjugation

of the subject by suggestion. The analyst is not the master, yet he is lodged in

the logos, and he has to believe in it for the sinthome to have a chance of being

reduced. He has to believe in it in order to make himself a piece of trash starting

from the place of a semblant: the

object a

.”

p. 47

Ketraro-Deutsch, Einav.

Reading a Symptom Backwards: Attempting

a Workable Sinthome in Virginia Woolf ’s “The Voyage Out.”

[RT 7,

2014]

“Throughout her life, Virginia Woolf wanted to write as a painter would paint;

finding ‘new forms’ rather than new phrases. Virginia Woolf approaches space

in her texts as a prerequisite of writing; her spatial concerns are not simplistic

and not metaphorical, they are the textual outcome of an attempt at producing

a sinthome. Woolf ’s aim in

The Voyage Out

(1915) was to forge a sinthome for

herself by means of writing as a practice situated on the level of the real. ‘The

writing of little letters’ says Lacan, ‘is what supports the real’ and since Woolf ’s

problem is located in the imaginary and the symbolic, her solution is located in

writing which is the realm of the real.”

p. 159-160

The Voyage Out

marks Woolf ’s first attempt at a shape that would make ‘life

reasonable’ and writing possible. By suturing the narratives together so that

they would be ‘indistinguishable’, Woolf attempted a unity of structure that she

never achieves.

Lacking logic on the level of the narrative, the structure however, reveals a

distinct pattern of attempt and failure of a workable sinthome which makes

sense regardless of the order in which one is reading it.”

p. 167

Laurent, Éric.

Psychoanalytic treatments of the psychoses

[2003].

Trans.: T. Lachin, [PN 26, 2013]

“When Lacan says:

Joyce the symptom

, it is to say that, as sinthome, he is the

person who manages to identify with his effort to produce a new language in

Finnegans Wake. The Joycean operation on language is extremely strange. It no

longer has anything to do with the truth of the unconscious.”

p. 107

Authors of the Freudian Field